« Crisis on Infinite Canadian Earths | Main | Flea Rules! »

August 07, 2004

Comments

Keith

It's like the man has a special cabinet post, someone who sits around all day thinking up ways he can say something hypocritical.

peter ramus

The President would be the last to deny there's great merit in being well-born.

Carlos

The Bush men married up. Not sure if that counts as well-born. Samuel Prescott Bush was about four tiers down from our gracious hostess's noted ancestor; his firm made boxcar couplings, and he made his personal connections by being an avid sportsman, in what we would call today semipro football and baseball, and also tennis. It got him the ear of Herbert Hoover, who was then known as the brilliant humanitarian who organized the post-WWI European famine relief; and it got his son into Yale.

It's sort of like _The Magnificent Ambersons_, except I don't think Booth Tarkington could ever have conceived of his George becoming President.

Peter Sean Bradley

Fair enough. If this idea had been introduced 35 years ago we would have been spared a few generations of inane Kennedys.

"Public uprising at Runnymede" indeed.

Hogan

"Public uprising at Runnymede" indeed.

RFK Jr. went to Brown. No legacyhood there (but no surprise on the quality of the historical knowledge, either).

Peter Sean Bradley

Hogan,

Are you suggesting that RFK, Jr. got into Brown based on his scholastic aptitude?

Or is this just some kind of East Coast/Ivy League assessment that inbred, indulgently-coddled wealthy folk are sent off to Brown where the admission standards are so much lower?

Carlos

Since RFK did not go to Brown, it would be a little difficult for RFKj to be a legacy admission there.

[waits for the moment of PSB's enlightment, then realizes it might be a while]

In related news, Chicago is not a state.

baa

On the PSB vs. Carlos debate. Carlos, I think you;ve got the words but not the music: strict legacy vs. getting in with a famous family name. Aren't both equally anti-meritocratic?

More generally, if we wanted more proof that hypocrisy is not the worst vice, this is it. Ted Kennedy probably thinks legacy admits are bad. To me, that's a plus in his column, not a minus.

belle

Relevant Simpsons:
[Teacher hands Lisa a paper] Lisa Simpson, zero!
Lisa: [gasps]
Skinner: Lisa, the president of Harvard would like to see you.
Pres.: Nasty business, that zero. Naturally, Harvard's doors are now closed to you, but I'll pass your file along to [snickers] Brown.
Skinner: Mmmm, Brown. Heckuva school. Weren't you at Brown, Otto?
[camera pans to Otto, sunning himself on the hood of the school bus]
Otto: Yup. Almost got tenure, too.
Lisa:[gasps in horror] No, not Brown, Brown, Brown!!

Hogan

Lisa's going to Stanford, Lisa's going to Stanford . . .

ben wolfson

Hey, as long as it's not Vassar.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Email John & Belle

  • he.jpgjholbo-at-mac-dot-com
  • she.jpgbbwaring-at-yahoo-dot-com

Google J&B


J&B Archives

Buy Reason and Persuasion!

S&O @ J&B

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing items in a set called Squid and Owl. Make your own badge here.

Reason and Persuasion Illustrations

  • www.flickr.com

J&B Have A Tipjar


  • Search Now:

  • Buy a couple books, we get a couple bucks.
Blog powered by Typepad

J&B Have A Comment Policy

  • This edited version of our comment policy is effective as of May 10, 2006.

    By publishing a comment to this blog you are granting its proprietors, John Holbo and Belle Waring, the right to republish that comment in any way shape or form they see fit.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you hereby agree to the following as well: by leaving a comment you grant to the proprietors the right to release ALL your comments to this blog under this Creative Commons license (attribution 2.5). This license allows copying, derivative works, and commercial use.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you are also granting to this blog's proprietors the right to so release any and all comments you may make to any OTHER blog at any time. This is retroactive. By publishing ANY comment to this blog, you thereby grant to the proprietors of this blog the right to release any of your comments (made to any blog, at any time, past, present or future) under the terms of the above CC license.

    Posting a comment constitutes consent to the following choice of law and choice of venue governing any disputes arising under this licensing arrangement: such disputes shall be adjudicated according to Canadian law and in the courts of Singapore.

    If you do NOT agree to these terms, for pete's sake do NOT leave a comment. It's that simple.

  • Confused by our comment policy?

    We're testing a strong CC license as a form of troll repellant. Does that sound strange? Read this thread. (I know, it's long. Keep scrolling. Further. Further. Ah, there.) So basically, we figure trolls will recognize that selling coffee cups and t-shirts is the best revenge, and will keep away. If we're wrong about that, at least someone can still sell the cups and shirts. (Sigh.)