« Potato Tortilla | Main | Cosmic Ponywatch, over coffee edition »

September 27, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451601c69e200e55022c1e98833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Get Shorty:

Comments

Jeremy Osner

I think you're talking about the same way I did short division, which is just like long division except you're not writing it all out -- i.e. instead of writing the product of the current digit and the divisor on the line below the dividend and subtracting, you do the product and subtraction in your head and scribble the answer next to the next digit of the dividend. More difficult for a teacher to grade because you are not showing your work. Handy though.

My complaint with the whole way division of fractions is taught, is I think it obscures the nature of fractions, which are quotients of two numbers -- the best way to think about multiplying or dividing with fractional operands, I think, is to think of it as an iterative process -- you are multiplying integers and taking the quotient -- "dividing" is the same as "multiplying by the reciprocal" and "reciprocal of n" is "the quotient of 1 and n", once you can get that in mind I think the process makes much more sense than just following a rule to "flip over" the divisor.

ben wolfson

I was really chuffed when I figured out why "numerator" and "denominator" were so named. Like, the numerator numbers the fraction! One fifth! Four fifths! And the denominator gives it its general name—fifths, because it's five!

It blew my 20-year-old mind.

Jeremy Osner

Ooh that is cool. Though this naming convention obscures the fact that they are simply a dividend and a divisor. Thanks for the observation, I will take that one with me.

Paul

I had something of the opposite experience in second grade. After teaching us "long multiplication", the teacher told us there was a "short cut" but wasn't going to tell us what it was. I banged my head against it for a while but didn't get anything. Later she mentioned that some people had figured out that you didn't have to write down the digits that you didn't have to write down every single digit you carried. Yeah, you save a little bit of time, but not sure it merits being a shortcut.

I'll have to remember the fraction naming thing, though, Ben.

dsquared

the only way to teach division correctly is to say rather quickly "it's the opposite of multiplication" and greet all further enquiries with an aggressive glare. I think that the ability to generate a sufficiently lethal glare was part of the teacher's exams in Wales in the 1970s.

Jeremy Osner

A similar tactic also works well when you're teaching how to take roots.

eurocent

In Spain we *only* learn short division @ school. Never knew there was a "long division".

we write it this way, though:

Dividend | Divisor
---------
Quotient

eurocent

Oops, comment got formatted the wrong way.
the quotient goes below the Divisor, not the dividend.

David Leland

Belle, what years were you at Winyah Academy? Your name sounds familiar. I would have been class of '87 had the school not closed.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Email John & Belle

  • he.jpgjholbo-at-mac-dot-com
  • she.jpgbbwaring-at-yahoo-dot-com

Google J&B


J&B Archives

Hey Kids! Free Plato Book!

S&O @ J&B

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing items in a set called Squid and Owl. Make your own badge here.

Reason and Persuasion Illustrations

  • www.flickr.com

J&B Have A Tipjar


  • Search Now:

  • Buy a couple books, we get a couple bucks.
Blog powered by Typepad

J&B Have A Comment Policy

  • This edited version of our comment policy is effective as of May 10, 2006.

    By publishing a comment to this blog you are granting its proprietors, John Holbo and Belle Waring, the right to republish that comment in any way shape or form they see fit.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you hereby agree to the following as well: by leaving a comment you grant to the proprietors the right to release ALL your comments to this blog under this Creative Commons license (attribution 2.5). This license allows copying, derivative works, and commercial use.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you are also granting to this blog's proprietors the right to so release any and all comments you may make to any OTHER blog at any time. This is retroactive. By publishing ANY comment to this blog, you thereby grant to the proprietors of this blog the right to release any of your comments (made to any blog, at any time, past, present or future) under the terms of the above CC license.

    Posting a comment constitutes consent to the following choice of law and choice of venue governing any disputes arising under this licensing arrangement: such disputes shall be adjudicated according to Canadian law and in the courts of Singapore.

    If you do NOT agree to these terms, for pete's sake do NOT leave a comment. It's that simple.

  • Confused by our comment policy?

    We're testing a strong CC license as a form of troll repellant. Does that sound strange? Read this thread. (I know, it's long. Keep scrolling. Further. Further. Ah, there.) So basically, we figure trolls will recognize that selling coffee cups and t-shirts is the best revenge, and will keep away. If we're wrong about that, at least someone can still sell the cups and shirts. (Sigh.)