« Priorities | Main | WTF^10,000 »

September 02, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451601c69e200e5503705f98834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference This Is Not Good:

» Katrina's consequences -- rethinking homeland security? from chez Nadezhda
The Armchair Generalist has two thoughtful posts that provide essential background on what are certain to be hot topics in the coming days:

» Precisely from Making Light
Belle Waring: Say what you like about casting blame for the unfolding tragedy in NO, the bare facts of the... [Read More]

» Consultants Advisory Group™ (CAG): A Security Company Born Every Minute? from Kathryn Cramer
Following the New Orleans disaster, a lot of us were wondering where all that money for homeland security went, since not much securing of the homeland seems to have taken place. I think I'm beginning to understand. Have a look [Read More]

» Consultants Advisory Group™ (CAG): A Security Company Born Every Minute? from Kathryn Cramer
Following the New Orleans disaster, a lot of us were wondering where all that money for homeland security went, since not much securing of the homeland seems to have taken place. I think I'm beginning to understand. Have a look [Read More]

» Consultants Advisory Group™ (CAG): A Security Company Born Every Minute? from Kathryn Cramer
Following the New Orleans disaster, a lot of us were wondering where all that money for homeland security went, since not much securing of the homeland seems to have taken place. I think I'm beginning to understand. Have a look [Read More]

» Consultants Advisory Group™ (CAG): A Security Company Born Every Minute? from Kathryn Cramer
Following the New Orleans disaster, a lot of us were wondering where all that money for homeland security went, since not much securing of the homeland seems to have taken place. I think I'm beginning to understand. Have a look [Read More]

» Consultants Advisory Group™ (CAG): A Security Company Born Every Minute? from Kathryn Cramer
Following the New Orleans disaster, a lot of us were wondering where all that money for homeland security went, since not much securing of the homeland seems to have taken place. I think I'm beginning to understand. Have a look [Read More]

Comments

LizardBreath

Um, yes. I think we can now say that nothing we've done since September 11 has enhanced our disaster response capability in the slightest. Kind of a pity.

alkali

I think we all assumed that this administration was doing the best that it could with respect to disaster response. Unfortunately, it turns out we were right.

Kathleen

Could not agree more.

scstroup

Yes, yes we are. Well and truly and, as we are wont to say, eight ways to Sunday.

badgerbag

I so agree.

I do have some hopes that Houston is going to be a model of organized disaster relief... I think people there will be not only decent on the whole, but will handle it intelligently.

I liked it that Diane Sawyer asked Bush if oil companies would voluntarily cut their profit margin to help with disaster relief.

I wonder too about banks and their eventual profits from people who can't pay their mortgages. People lose their homes or businesses and land, and then tax money goes to rebuild the city and the banks and developers, who have the huge amount of capital necessary to weather that, come out on top.

arto

So if Katrina is the new 9/11, does that mean Bush is gonna invade Cuba?

James Slusher

He won't invade Cuba, but he will be glad to rape Mother Nature as a bit of payback.

Doctor Slack

Armando over at Kos has a pretty comprehensive post up about what seems to have happened with the response to Katrina. (Note in particular the apparent indifference to NO's "low-mobility population.") There are some things there that, under any other Administration, would have been shocking.

Timothy Burke

Houston officials have just decided that the Astrodome can actually only hold 5,000 and are turning away some arriving buses. So much for the hope that Houston would somehow step up to the plate in a way that officials inside the catastrophe couldn't manage.

Raffi

I have to say that I don't follow all this criticism. Has the reaction been ideal? Obviously not. But the scale of the catastrophe is extraordinary. An area more than half the size of France has been destroyed and one of our cities is apparently in a state of post-apocalyptic chaos. No plan could possibly accomodate these things.

belle waring

raffi, there are people dying of thirst and hunger outside the NO convention center, in an area totally acessable to news media somehow (I have seen many reports filmed there), a place from which buses going to other locations are regularly seen passing by, four days after the storm, and we can't airlift any fucking water in there to save little children? in fucking america? to quote GWB, this is not acceptable.

Doctor Slack

But the scale of the catastrophe is extraordinary.

The US was able to deploy heavy machinery, an aircraft carrier and water purification equipment halfway around the planet within five days of the tsunami disaster. The anemic response to this catastrophe on its own soil is inescapably bizarre, though -- to those of us on the irrational Bush-hating left -- not entire unpredictable.

John Frost

The question everyone should be asking is, what if this was a terrorist attack or a natural disaster with little or no warning (if I still lived near an earthquake zone, I'd be asking if my local planners had a handle on things)? The answer is we would have 1.8 million dead and only 20,000 refugees instead of the other way around. The resounding thud you heard is the ball being dropped up in Washington DC and we should throw them all out because of it. In some countries they would be resigning in shame right now.

I've posted some ideas on what should have been done on my blog.

Another Damned Medievalist

It's fucking appalling. Please let people see that these 'small government, privatize everything, lower taxes, denigrate meritocracy' assholes need to go even more today than they did four years ago.

Abigail

Am I wrong to conclude that a person would be better off as a survivor of the Asian tsunami in some god-forsaken village in Singapore than they would be as a survivor of Hurricane Katrina in downtown New Orleans?

Andrew John

Er, Abigail, you might want to note that (i) Singapore is a city state and has no villages in the usual sense of the term; (ii) Singapore is one of the richest countries in the world; and (iii) Singapore was unaffected by the tsunami. That said, were you to substitute "Thailand" for "Singapore", the answer is almost certainly yes. Even if you were to substitute "Aceh" or "Sri Lanka" for "Singapore", the answer might well be yes.

Abigail

Oops. I was thinking about Sri Lanka. That's what I get for commenting at 3 AM.

Randolph Fritz

"I think we had all assumed that in the meantime a lot of wargaming and disaster-mitigation planning and homeland security gearup had been going on."

There's so much evidence of mismanagement at Homeland Security--why did you think this?

Kathryn Cramer

I've sent you a trackback. I think I'm beginning to understand where the HS money went.

CAG

Kathryn Cramer Publishes Lies to Harm Relations Between MINUSTAH and Cité-Soliel Residents.

The website kathryncramer.com is being used by an American fiction editor/writer to spread false rumors designed to harm relations between MINUSTAH and the residents of Cité-Soleil. Cramer would like people to believe the UN has hired spies to upset the elections and mercenaries to shoot Haitians from patrol boats waiting in the waters off Cité-Soleil. This is blatantly false. Cramer is lying. To support her claims, Cramer is publishing a set of forged documents and presentations supposedly produced by MINUSTAH. MINUSTAH spokespersons have repeatedly stated these presentations are fakes designed to spread anti-UN propaganda and contribute to the insecurity of the Haitian people struggling to survive in Cité-Soleil. These lies come just in time to do the most harm as the February 7 elections draw near. The story Cramer tells is a lie with no basis in truth. By continuing to publish these false UN documents Cramer is supporting the evil propaganda of the criminal gangs and the ADLN. Cramer has also been claiming that CAG is somehow involved in these nefarious deeds. CAG is not in the business of spying, conducting surveillance or any form of covert “black-ops” as Cramer contends. CAG is an international management consulting firm actively involved and deeply committed to finding enduring solutions for the complex institutional and infrastructure problems of the nation. CAG is neutral regarding all political matters and sincerely desires to continue its support for the Haitian people no matter which candidate wins office.

Doctor Slack

CAG: Funny, until you posted your fervid rant against Cramer, I probably wouldn't have clicked over to her blog and read the full saga there. Good job driving traffic to her site, where there are indeed many interesting questions.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Email John & Belle

  • he.jpgjholbo-at-mac-dot-com
  • she.jpgbbwaring-at-yahoo-dot-com

Google J&B


J&B Archives

Hey Kids! Free Plato Book!

S&O @ J&B

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing items in a set called Squid and Owl. Make your own badge here.

Reason and Persuasion Illustrations

  • www.flickr.com

J&B Have A Tipjar


  • Search Now:

  • Buy a couple books, we get a couple bucks.
Blog powered by Typepad

J&B Have A Comment Policy

  • This edited version of our comment policy is effective as of May 10, 2006.

    By publishing a comment to this blog you are granting its proprietors, John Holbo and Belle Waring, the right to republish that comment in any way shape or form they see fit.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you hereby agree to the following as well: by leaving a comment you grant to the proprietors the right to release ALL your comments to this blog under this Creative Commons license (attribution 2.5). This license allows copying, derivative works, and commercial use.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you are also granting to this blog's proprietors the right to so release any and all comments you may make to any OTHER blog at any time. This is retroactive. By publishing ANY comment to this blog, you thereby grant to the proprietors of this blog the right to release any of your comments (made to any blog, at any time, past, present or future) under the terms of the above CC license.

    Posting a comment constitutes consent to the following choice of law and choice of venue governing any disputes arising under this licensing arrangement: such disputes shall be adjudicated according to Canadian law and in the courts of Singapore.

    If you do NOT agree to these terms, for pete's sake do NOT leave a comment. It's that simple.

  • Confused by our comment policy?

    We're testing a strong CC license as a form of troll repellant. Does that sound strange? Read this thread. (I know, it's long. Keep scrolling. Further. Further. Ah, there.) So basically, we figure trolls will recognize that selling coffee cups and t-shirts is the best revenge, and will keep away. If we're wrong about that, at least someone can still sell the cups and shirts. (Sigh.)