« Pâté | Main | Galantine »

February 02, 2006

Norriswatch!

he.jpg"The Justice Riders realized that whatever they would do or become they would not tolerate evil, oppression, or injustice." (via Bookslut)

The book description is anaphorically unbuckled: "From the gold and silver mines of California and Nevada to the wide open plains of Texas, the American West was a wild frontier in the 1870s where dangerous outlaws pursued devilish dreams of fortune. But there were other men of simple faith, unsung Civil War heroes who adventured west to bring justice to places that had none. Those they called "The Justice Riders."

So they called the places 'the Justice Riders'?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/563/4174198

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Norriswatch!:

Comments

I don't quite get your objection. "Those" clearly refers to "other men". Sure, the prose is purple. But I don't think there's any confusion with pronoun referents. Look: the second sentence begins "But there were other men..." and the third begins "Those they called..." I think you'd have to really strain to read "those" as referring to the noun near the end of the second sentence which is not the main subject of the second sentence. Just my $.02.

You're right that no actual confusion is going to result, Jeremy. It's just that 'those' should technically refer back to the closest prior plural noun, which is places. Also, 'they' should refer back to some mentioned persons. (Obviously, 'they say ...' is standard English for 'it sort of gets said'. But it seems odd to encounter it in this specific context.) Basically, it's just clunky. More importantly: Chuck Norris wrote a novel!

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Email John & Belle

  • he.jpgjholbo-at-mac-dot-com
  • she.jpgbbwaring-at-yahoo-dot-com

Google J&B


J&B Archives

J&B Have A Tipjar


  • Search Now:

  • Buy a couple books, we get a couple bucks.
Blog powered by TypePad

J&B Have A Comment Policy

  • This edited version of our comment policy is effective as of May 10, 2006.

    By publishing a comment to this blog you are granting its proprietors, John Holbo and Belle Waring, the right to republish that comment in any way shape or form they see fit.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you hereby agree to the following as well: by leaving a comment you grant to the proprietors the right to release ALL your comments to this blog under this Creative Commons license (attribution 2.5). This license allows copying, derivative works, and commercial use.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you are also granting to this blog's proprietors the right to so release any and all comments you may make to any OTHER blog at any time. This is retroactive. By publishing ANY comment to this blog, you thereby grant to the proprietors of this blog the right to release any of your comments (made to any blog, at any time, past, present or future) under the terms of the above CC license.

    Posting a comment constitutes consent to the following choice of law and choice of venue governing any disputes arising under this licensing arrangement: such disputes shall be adjudicated according to Canadian law and in the courts of Singapore.

    If you do NOT agree to these terms, for pete's sake do NOT leave a comment. It's that simple.

  • Confused by our comment policy?

    We're testing a strong CC license as a form of troll repellant. Does that sound strange? Read this thread. (I know, it's long. Keep scrolling. Further. Further. Ah, there.) So basically, we figure trolls will recognize that selling coffee cups and t-shirts is the best revenge, and will keep away. If we're wrong about that, at least someone can still sell the cups and shirts. (Sigh.)