Orin Kerr recently noted that Harvard has ended its early action program. They have decided that it seriously disadvantaged lower-income and minority students, which is pretty commonsensical. Students who have to wait and see whether they get financial aid are reluctant to commit early to an expensive school (not directly relevant for Harvard as it wasn't an ED program, but clearly they are hoping to influence the other Ivies). Likewise, someone who is the first person in her family to go to college just isn't likely to know that applying EA gives you better odds of getting in, and may be less likely to get all her application material together early, when it appears that the official deadline is in early January. Libertarian responses to Harvard changing its own policies to a single application date because they judged the previous policy inferior: teh funny.
Jeremy T: Why doesn't Harvard just go ahead and ban white males from campus?
Seems a lot simpler than monkeying around with admissions timelines. [Harvard admissions officer slaps forehead: "why didn't I think of that?!"]
tefta2: This will give Harvard more spaces in the freshman class to admit as
many of the 15,000 fully funded students the Saudi's are sending our
way? Saudi sheiks already own a large chunk of Harvard, so it'll be
interesting to see what the next freshman class looks like. ["Lol! all ur unis r belong 2 us! well b rockin the califate 2morrow! i'm psting your mom's n00dz on cregslist rite now!!!"--the Islamofascists]
GMUSL3: Mikeyes,
was there actually anybody who wasn't aware that you have better
chances of getting in somewhere in return for applying early? Not in my
mind. Any student who was so clueless as to be unaware of that
widespread piece of common knowledge doesn't deserve to get into ANY
college. [Yeah! That'll show those morons!]
Stephen F:
I was on my own, with inadequate guidance from parents, peers, or
the school system. I learned about this stuff only after it was too
late.
I didn't have much guidance from parents or counselor re: early
action, either. I did, however, get a little curious when I was looking
over applications that said "Check one: early action, regular action."
That curiosity prompted me to read the accompanying booklet. But I
guess to Harvard's mind, minorities are incapable of similar reasoning. [Didn't have "much guidance...re: early action." Why not? Too busy in SAT prep.]
Mike BUSL07: My girlfriend teaches in Bushwick and sometimes I drop her off at work.
Right next to her school there is a public library. With high-speed
internet access. The school too has high speed internet access. If you
live in Bushwick, (you are probably black or Dominican), and you plan
on applying to Harvard, then nothing stops you from going to
www.harvard.edu/admissions. If you don't do it, then, as someone
already said, maybe college isn't for you in the first place. [I've seen black people! Real ones! Like, from the car! And probably even Hispanics, but I was driving pretty fast by then.]
And finally, Mike BUSL07 wins the whole internet...with this:
What precisely is the problem with wealthy parents using their
resources to secure advanced position for their children? After all,
isn't that a large part of why we want financial security? So that our
kids may have good and happy lives? As an abstraction, and its efficacy
aside, I have no problem with an attempt by the colleges to level the
playing field in terms of *opportunity.* But there is nothing
inherently evil or wrong about inequality, an upper hand honestly
obtained.
I don't know whether Harvard's decision is wise, whether it will
prove to be effective, or whether it was made in good faith. But as a
broader matter, let's not sink to the level of Soviet Russia. Just
because someone lives in shit does not mean that everyone else should
too. [Shorter Mike: if poor people don't suffer, what's the fucking point of being rich?]
Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be Objectivists. No, really, don't.
*In fairness to Jim Henley, a lot of Volokh commenters (and posters) are straight-up Republicans, or Schmibertarians at best. Y'all are stuck with Mike, though. Enjoy!
Recent Comments