« We're Home!! | Main | Basic Architecture »

April 02, 2008

Would The Architect of Glass-Steagall Please Come On Down

she.jpgNice to see the Washington Post offer a little straight talk about America's most mavericky, mavericking maverick ever and his array of contradictory (yet evil!) economic advisers:

One of them helped deregulate the financial services industries in the 1990s, and now sits in the corporate suites of Swiss banking giant UBS, which yesterday announced $19 billion in investment losses tied to the crumbling U.S. real estate market. The other pushed one of the most aggressive and controversial mergers of the technology boom, then was sacked by the disenchanted board of Hewlett-Packard.

Former senator Phil Gramm, with his aw-shucks Texas drawl, may at first blush have little in common with Carly Fiorina, the telegenic former chief executive of Hewlett-Packard. But they share a bond: Both are leading economic advisers of Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the presumptive Republican nominee for president, and both have reputations as the kind of aggressive capitalists that may be sliding from favor as the nation's economy edges toward recession....

The spiraling crisis in the credit and housing markets has kept Gramm in focus, fairly or not. His employer, UBS, revealed yesterday that investment losses tied to the U.S. housing market reached $37 billion over the last six months. For the last three months, UBS posted a $12 billion loss.

Gramm, UBS's vice chairman, said yesterday he was "totally unaware" of his bank's massive holdings of securities tied to subprime mortgages, but, he added, "I'm confident we'll recover."

OK, a) it seems one could be either totally unaware of the state of the bank's balance sheet, or justly confident in its solvency, but surely not both. B), could we please make a national agreement to stop pretending that people's southern or Texan accents mean they're some sort of bumpkin naïf likely to be scared by the horseless streetcars and complex derivative swaps of the big city? FFS.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/563/27691008

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Would The Architect of Glass-Steagall Please Come On Down:

Comments

Your (a) seems wrong to me: I think it would make it a lot easier to maintain confidence in UBS's ability to recover from the crisis, if one maintained a state of total ignorance about UBS's investments in sub-prime mortgages. Your (b) is a good idea though.

I said "justly", man. but, yeah.

B) is good, but to it I'd add C) the possession of a southern or Texan accent shall not be taken as evidence that the bearer is of good, plainspoken, moral character.

Cala, can we add a...hmm, codicil to C?

If one is in fact bearing such accent, dollars to donuts, there are excellent odds bearer has intention to do harm to the integrity of the of the republic, and should have their motives questioned at every turn.

Interesting theory on the accents. How does Molly Ivins fit with it?

could we please make a national agreement to stop pretending that people's southern or Texan accents mean they're some sort of bumpkin naïf likely to be scared by the horseless streetcars and complex derivative swaps of the big city? FFS

if this is preparing the ground for a campaign to get "Dallas" back on the telly, count me in.

I think the point of the comparison with Fiorina was more to emphasize that Gramm is tit free.

Contra your (b), the opening monologue of No Country For Old Men is pretty amazing.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Email John & Belle

  • he.jpgjholbo-at-mac-dot-com
  • she.jpgbbwaring-at-yahoo-dot-com

Google J&B


J&B Archives

J&B Have A Tipjar


  • Search Now:

  • Buy a couple books, we get a couple bucks.
Blog powered by TypePad

J&B Have A Comment Policy

  • This edited version of our comment policy is effective as of May 10, 2006.

    By publishing a comment to this blog you are granting its proprietors, John Holbo and Belle Waring, the right to republish that comment in any way shape or form they see fit.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you hereby agree to the following as well: by leaving a comment you grant to the proprietors the right to release ALL your comments to this blog under this Creative Commons license (attribution 2.5). This license allows copying, derivative works, and commercial use.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you are also granting to this blog's proprietors the right to so release any and all comments you may make to any OTHER blog at any time. This is retroactive. By publishing ANY comment to this blog, you thereby grant to the proprietors of this blog the right to release any of your comments (made to any blog, at any time, past, present or future) under the terms of the above CC license.

    Posting a comment constitutes consent to the following choice of law and choice of venue governing any disputes arising under this licensing arrangement: such disputes shall be adjudicated according to Canadian law and in the courts of Singapore.

    If you do NOT agree to these terms, for pete's sake do NOT leave a comment. It's that simple.

  • Confused by our comment policy?

    We're testing a strong CC license as a form of troll repellant. Does that sound strange? Read this thread. (I know, it's long. Keep scrolling. Further. Further. Ah, there.) So basically, we figure trolls will recognize that selling coffee cups and t-shirts is the best revenge, and will keep away. If we're wrong about that, at least someone can still sell the cups and shirts. (Sigh.)