Somewhat depressing Washington Post article:
TORKHAM, Afghanistan, Nov. 18 -- A rise in Taliban attacks along the length of a vital NATO supply route that runs through this border town in the shadow of the
Khyber Pass has U.S. officials seeking alternatives, including the
prospect of beginning deliveries by a tortuous overland journey from
Europe.
Supplying troops in landlocked Afghanistan has long been
the Achilles' heel of foreign armies here, most recently the Soviets,
whose forces were nearly crippled by Islamist insurgent attacks on
vulnerable supply lines.
About 75 percent of NATO and U.S.
supplies bound for Afghanistan -- including gas, food and military
equipment -- are transported over land through Pakistan. The journey
begins in the southern Pakistani port city of Karachi and continues
north through Pakistan's volatile North-West Frontier Province and
tribal areas before supplies arrive at the Afghan border. The convoys
then press forward along mountain hairpin turns through areas of
Afghanistan that are known as havens for insurgents.
Drivers at
this busy border crossing say death threats from the Taliban arrive
almost daily. Sometimes they come in the form of a letter taped to the
windshield of a truck late at night. Occasionally, a dispatcher
receives an early-morning phone call before a convoy sets off from
Pakistan. More often, the threats are delivered at the end of a gun
barrel.
"The Taliban, they tell us, 'These goods belong to the
Americans. Don't bring them to the Americans. If you do, we'll kill
you,' " said Rahmanullah, a truck driver from the Pakistani tribal town
of Landikotal. "From Karachi to Kabul there is trouble. The whole route
is insecure."
The growing danger has forced the Pentagon to seek far longer, but possibly safer, alternate routes through Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia, according to Defense Department documents. A notice to potential contractors by the U.S. Transportation
Command in September said that "strikes, border delays, accidents and
pilferage" in Pakistan and the risk of "attacks and armed hijackings"
in Afghanistan posed "a significant risk" to supplies for Western
forces in Afghanistan.
A reliable supply route is considered
vital to sustaining the approximately 67,000 foreign troops stationed
in Afghanistan, including 32,000 Americans. Nearly half of U.S. forces
operate under NATO command. Attacks on convoys have also been a problem
in Iraq, where the United States has improvised effective but costly
ways to keep supplies flowing.
I don't know jack about logistics, but I don't think routing things through Iran is going to be real practical...um, Turkmenistan?
Recent Comments