Well, I signed us up for Amazon Associates about three weeks ago, guess it was, and we have so far made a few cents over ten bucks, selling 18 items. But I'm sort of hooked. I used to be obsessed with referrer logs and site traffic, climbing the greased pole of technorati and blogstreet. I have put away such childish things. Now I'm fascinating by the fact that I sell nothing whatsoever for four days, then a nursing textbook, a couple bluegrass CD's and a used Jumanji DVD all in one day. For a tidy profit of $1.26 or so. Checking once a day, it's like a combined advent calendar and Ben Katchor cardboard valise-style comic (quite a number of which you can see online here.) From the gnawed remains of 5,000 broiled lambchop dinners we can manufacture one artificial wool men's sportjacket. From 1,000 idle blog clicks, we can manufacture 1 used VHS copy of "Honey, I shrunk the kids" & 13 shiny pennies. So it goes. There is a pre-socratic effrontery to this endless transmutation of one fundamental element into another. Also, a philistine, yet almost fideistic disregard for the Principle of Sufficient Reason.
Kidding and kadging aside, Amazon just did something weird: marked down a bunch of season 1 DVD collections 75%. So you can get all the following for $14.99 each. Limit 2 per item per customer, since obviously you can turn around and sell them for more than you spent. I don't really understand the commercial logic but I have a theory that it can't last. I think I'm buying three of 'em. (UPDATE: Sale's over. Don't bother clicking.]
And you know what. I think I'll tell you a story about Futurama.
Way back in '97 or so Belle and I were thinking about writing a detective novel together, one plot-twist of which was going to be: product-placement in dreams. You see, it's driving people mad because dreams are supposed to be sites of wish-fulfillment. So our detective, who works for a renegade Freudian who spies on his patients - well, we were working on it - Belle still is, actually - then someone told me at a party our idea got used in a Futurama episode; then a couple weeks later it was a cartoon in the "New Yorker". Which would have been alright except I knew a guy who was writing for Futurama. And one night I had told him about our idea, then after I heard this I ran into him again and asked whether he had written the episode in question, and he had, but he denied he got the idea from me. And he told me that, when it comes to good ideas, it's a matter of being the first one to get it out there. Ah, well. Just a gag. Maybe the guy even forgot where he got it. Seemed like a nice guy. But if you think my joke - it was mine, MINE - was worth a couple bucks, you'll buy your first season Futurama collection through me.
Belle won't mind me giving away the twist, because unless we explain, folks will think we stole it from Futurama. How embarrassing. Lots of other good stuff in the novel. Before I handed it over to my wife it was supposed to be entitled, It's Never Too Early To Wish For An Early Grave. Sort of a noirish atmosphere, plus a Philip K Dickish 'It's a title, but it's also a sentence!' title. But now it's all Belle, so she can call it what she likes.
That reminds of the long story at the end of Katchor's second collection of Julius Knipl comics, actually (unless it was the third collection, but I think The Beauty Supply District was the third), with the Evening Combinator.
Posted by: ben wolfson | October 20, 2004 at 11:23 PM
Yeah, I think that's what I was thinking about. The Beauty Supply District. That's the one.
Posted by: jholbo | October 20, 2004 at 11:44 PM
My friend Sarah's brother was the creator with Matt G of Futurama, so I watched it quite closely, and have even listened the commentary on the discs. The commentary is great, because about 1 1/2 seasons worth, at least, was recorded after they knew that they had no future (ironic, and Bender would agree), so they don't have any compunction about being really bizarre or critiquing the networks or what have you.
Posted by: Glenn Fleishman | October 21, 2004 at 01:05 AM
I would guess the logic is to get you hooked on the first season, then jack up the price when you come back looking for more. A similar marketing strategy can be found by those selling giant cookies at the mall.
Posted by: DJW | October 21, 2004 at 02:16 AM
Comedy writers, tsk. Thieves and malcontents all.
Though if his initials were DV, I am pretty sure this was something we originally discussed back in college, along with the unresolvable question, "What if we're all Starfleet officers who have been deluded by Q?"
Posted by: Carlos | October 21, 2004 at 05:30 AM
Whoa, Carlos, that's heavy. But his initials weren't DV.
Hey, Glenn, thanks for dropping by. And I'll be sure to listen to the commentary. (I really bear the show no ill will over the petty intellectual theft of a joke. Funny show.)
I do idly wonder where Amazon makes its money these days. For example, are they significantly in the shipping business? I notice that there are often used items selling for a penny. Not much profit, unless you are really selling $3 worth of cardboard packaging and movement around the globe. Does Amazon turn a significant profit on shipping? No doubt their volume of sales allows them certain economic advantages in this area.
Also, although Associates don't make anything really, I can't imagine that Amazon does either after giving Associates their 5% commision. Surely their margin is razor thin (although their prices have gone up.) So is it just that their model demands maximizing volume of sales, even if it is profitless. Or are they perhaps most concerned to buy advertising. Amazon wants to be the very first hit for every single google search for every item they sell. Towards that end, hundreds of thousands of little Amazon buttons around the web is probably a pretty effective googlebomb.
Posted by: jholbo | October 21, 2004 at 07:47 AM
Their shipping profits have gone way down, with the introduction of a permanent free shipping option, though it makes a big positive impact on their volume and earnings. (Gift wrapping is still a profit source.)
Amazon is in large part an Associate now itself-- an Associate of Target, Toys R Us, lots of clothing and department stores, etc, etc. In exchange for doing nothing more than providing bandwidth, they get a nice share of massive amounts of sales of stuff besides books, videos, CDs, and software.
But the core business is profitable these days too. The days when Amazon's investors were swallowing a loss every time we book junkies bought books are over.
Posted by: Jacob T. Levy | October 21, 2004 at 10:44 AM
There'a guy who, with a bit of clever scripting and a really long .htaccess file, built a 3 million page dynamically generated Amazon affiliate site. Allegedly, he makes five figure profits a quarter. And this is *after* Google started cracking down on content-free Amazon sites. So you can make money from it; you just have to be fairly, um, strategic, about it.
Insane, really. I'm torn between finding the whole thing a bit dubious and feeling pure envy.
Posted by: Nick Caldwell | October 22, 2004 at 09:23 PM
I love the idea of product placement in dreams.
Posted by: Julian Elson | October 26, 2004 at 07:58 AM
I've been using Amazon for a while, and I agree, with a little technical work in the way of design and development, you can have a great looking amazon associates website.
I've developed a few myself, www.WeKnowPhoto.com and www.OnlineToolsandHardware.com to name a few, and they've done great. I started using Amazon Associates program as a way to supplement my income, but in the last few years, it has become one of my main income sources.
I would encourage everyone to take a second look at the amazon associates program if they haven't used it in a while.
thanks,
PuReWebDev
Posted by: PuReWebDev | November 14, 2008 at 11:48 AM