Minor follow-up to think/thing kerfuffle. Somehow I forgot to adduce the best bit of literary evidence on behalf of the nominative basis of the former view.
« Show Gary Farber the Money | Main | Narwhal disporting »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you hereby agree to the following as well: by leaving a comment you grant to the proprietors the right to release ALL your comments to this blog under this Creative Commons license (attribution 2.5). This license allows copying, derivative works, and commercial use.
Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you are also granting to this blog's proprietors the right to so release any and all comments you may make to any OTHER blog at any time. This is retroactive. By publishing ANY comment to this blog, you thereby grant to the proprietors of this blog the right to release any of your comments (made to any blog, at any time, past, present or future) under the terms of the above CC license.
Posting a comment constitutes consent to the following choice of law and choice of venue governing any disputes arising under this licensing arrangement: such disputes shall be adjudicated according to Canadian law and in the courts of Singapore.
If you do NOT agree to these terms, for pete's sake do NOT leave a comment. It's that simple.
Damn, that's brilliant. Will have to admit defeat to the sig. other now.
Posted by: Matt | March 26, 2005 at 01:49 AM
Ha-ha! Victory is to the "think"ers! If you have disagreed previously, click the link: your other think is coming!
If Dr. Seuss doesn't nail it down, nothing will.
Thanks, John.
Posted by: Kent | March 30, 2005 at 12:34 AM