I suppose everyone knows, but I've shifted the bulk of my posting over the The Valve. I probably won't be posting here much in the near future.
OK, one thing. We used to have a subscription to the "Economist" so we got the print version and read it regularly. But that stopped so we stopped. Belle picked up a copy off the rack couple weeks ago. The April 2nd issue. Old news now, but I sat down to read it, like old times. It's so soothing. Every major story has either the 'there are dark clouds on the horizon but there's a silver lining' structure; or 'it looks like a golden age, but there are dark clouds of the horizon' structure. It's comforting to know that, however bad it gets, there will always only be those two major stories, although small items and book reviews may deviate. Plus always with the Scottish devolution. I wouldn't know a thing about it without the "Economist". OK, here's the thing. Isn't it silly the way in which the "Economist" incorporates into its articles not just conservative talking points but American right wing-nut talking-points that are totally at odds with the paper's reality-based philosophy and outlook? From an article about radical Islam in the Netherlands: "What nobody knows is whether the new political right will succeed in persuading the Dutch - and indeed other Europeans - to embrace a new sort of politics which, like its American counterparts, puts strong emphasis on values and principles rather than expediency and compromise." The party of values? Surely no sane person - including sane Republicans - regards that as anything but a tattered banner left over from the lately concluded election. You don't use electoral slogans as premises in serious arguments. From an article about the filibuster 'go nuclear or no?' issue: "More generally, the American right's declared aim is to replace retiring "activist liberal" judges, such as those who sanction gay marriage, with those who interpret the constitution in a less cavalier way." You could interpret that generously, as an extended bit of implied indirect quotation, if it weren't for the scare quotes that open and then close before they get to the end of the scary bit. I suppose it's a sign of my steady leftward drift that I now read the "Economist" and frequently guffaw, whereas once I read the "Economist" and frequently disagreed.
I saw a Simpsons where Homer is reading the economist and says something like "Well, it looks like Malaysia faces problems with its foreign currency reserves." It was very funny.
Posted by: [email protected] | April 18, 2005 at 06:46 AM
I haven't read the article about radical islam in the Netherlands you mention, but it may be that the author isn't just echoing Republicans, but also knows a few things about Dutch politics. Values and principles - "normen en waarden" - are much more than an electoral talking point for our prime minister Balkenende. He's a 1950s style Christian Democrat, somehow escaped from a time capsule, and is completely obsessed by that "tattered banner". When the Netherlands chaired the EU he even tried to shame the country forever in the eyes of the world by attempting to organize an international conference on the subject.
Posted by: R.Mutt | April 18, 2005 at 02:08 PM
Well, John Ralston Saul announced The end of globalism, so maybe the "Economist" is convulsing in agony or something...
Posted by: abb1 | April 18, 2005 at 07:27 PM
Homer's quote is, "Look at me. I’m reading The Economist. Did you know Indonesia is at a crossroads?"
I still enjoy the Economist, but I'd agree that it seems to be drifting towards a non-reality based viewpoint.
Posted by: FS | April 19, 2005 at 03:41 AM
I'll say I love the Economist's style - wry isn't easy to do. (And yeah, it does have two kinds of articles - there's always an element of 'plus ca change...' in its tone.) The writer of the article did seem to know about Dutch politics - as R.Mutt notes above, Balkenende does talk a lot about values and principles. I agree that the analogy to American politics may not be valid, but it seems less an absorption of the right-wing talking points and more of an attempt to make the subject accessible by using a more well-known analogue...
Posted by: Daryl | April 19, 2005 at 11:44 PM
You know what they say about College Arts and Social Sciences faculties and the left wing :)
Posted by: Agagooga | April 20, 2005 at 01:10 AM
诺顿杀毒软件
杀毒软件
oa
瑞星杀毒软件
江民杀毒软件
杀毒软件专卖
诺顿企业版
瑞星2005
江民
瑞星
IPTV
办公自动化
邮件服务器
邮件系统
防火墙
系统集成
杀毒软件
瑞星杀毒软件
诺顿杀毒软件
MCAFEE杀毒软件
熊猫卫士杀毒软件
江民杀毒软件
金山杀毒软件
趋势杀毒软件
杀毒软件
qq病毒专杀
瑞星杀毒软件
江民杀毒软件
杀毒软件
网络防毒
交易网
瑞星杀毒
江民杀毒软件
诺顿
诺顿杀毒软件
杀毒软件
瑞星杀毒软件
瑞星杀毒
瑞星杀毒
服务器
视频服务器
虚拟演播室
ultra虚拟演播室
字幕机
功能服务器
媒体监播
办公自动化
媒体监测
广告监播
车载交警稽查
巧克力蛋糕
蛋糕
生日蛋糕
装饰
装饰公司
装饰材料
北京装饰
装饰网
家居装饰
装饰设计
室内装饰
装饰装修
北京装饰公司
邮件服务器
非编系统
触摸屏
ipod
影视制作
ibm服务器
hp服务器
dell服务器
办公自动化
防火墙
触摸屏
网络防毒
防毒墙
系统集成
邮件服务器
巧克力
防病毒
蛋糕
网络安全
情趣内衣
生日蛋糕
服务器
HP服务器
IBM服务器
视频服务器
宽带服务器
邮件服务器
字幕卡
非线编软件
非编卡
虚拟演播室
录相带
婚纱摄影
数码婚纱
Posted by: wntdcw | June 09, 2005 at 08:28 PM