« 33 - 'Courtesy of trebuchet ...'; plus Monster! | Main | 35 - 'Speeding in its swift descent ...' »

May 01, 2009

Comments

Salient

So why is Grimace making a guest appearance? :)

jholbo

Because I was trying to draw Rousseau?

(Unless you think Zoë's girl looks like Grimace.)

Salient

Because I was trying to draw Rousseau?

Ohhhhhhkay. I get it now. I thought maybe Owl borrowed a faux statue from the McDonaldsLand playpen area for the sake of winging it at some as-yet-unannounced foe.

Salient

By the way, insofar as each of them are developing personality characteristics, are there any persons/figures/philosophies you are modeling Squid and Owl after? (Panel #30 is my current favorite, though Owl's facial expression in #27 is priceless and will henceforth show up in the dictionaries under "mournful curiosity".)

jholbo

They have VERY slightly different philosophies. This will become a subject of upcoming installments.

Thank you kindly for the kind words.

It wasn't really supposed to look like Rousseau, although I toyed with trying to achieve a resemblance, so the final version may bear some vestige of that figment. But that would have committed Owl to a Rousseauian philosophy that, frankly, he does not fully espouse.

But it wasn't really supposed to look like Grimace either.

Think of it as Everybust.

Salient

"But that would have committed Owl to a Rousseauian philosophy that, frankly, he does not fully espouse."

Ah. So, Owl on Rousseau: "I don't reject him, I just traject him."

The comments to this entry are closed.

Email John & Belle

  • he.jpgjholbo-at-mac-dot-com
  • she.jpgbbwaring-at-yahoo-dot-com

Google J&B


J&B Archives

Buy Reason and Persuasion!

S&O @ J&B

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing items in a set called Squid and Owl. Make your own badge here.

Reason and Persuasion Illustrations

  • www.flickr.com

J&B Have A Tipjar


  • Search Now:

  • Buy a couple books, we get a couple bucks.
Blog powered by Typepad

J&B Have A Comment Policy

  • This edited version of our comment policy is effective as of May 10, 2006.

    By publishing a comment to this blog you are granting its proprietors, John Holbo and Belle Waring, the right to republish that comment in any way shape or form they see fit.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you hereby agree to the following as well: by leaving a comment you grant to the proprietors the right to release ALL your comments to this blog under this Creative Commons license (attribution 2.5). This license allows copying, derivative works, and commercial use.

    Severable from the above, and to the extent permitted by law, you are also granting to this blog's proprietors the right to so release any and all comments you may make to any OTHER blog at any time. This is retroactive. By publishing ANY comment to this blog, you thereby grant to the proprietors of this blog the right to release any of your comments (made to any blog, at any time, past, present or future) under the terms of the above CC license.

    Posting a comment constitutes consent to the following choice of law and choice of venue governing any disputes arising under this licensing arrangement: such disputes shall be adjudicated according to Canadian law and in the courts of Singapore.

    If you do NOT agree to these terms, for pete's sake do NOT leave a comment. It's that simple.

  • Confused by our comment policy?

    We're testing a strong CC license as a form of troll repellant. Does that sound strange? Read this thread. (I know, it's long. Keep scrolling. Further. Further. Ah, there.) So basically, we figure trolls will recognize that selling coffee cups and t-shirts is the best revenge, and will keep away. If we're wrong about that, at least someone can still sell the cups and shirts. (Sigh.)